The Australian Federal election has delivered a change in government. Unlike votes we have seen in other countries in the past five years, this isn’t an outcome likely to shock expectations or financial markets.
Cost of living issues will continue to dominate the economic agenda in the short term. Policy overstimulated, inflation has surprised, and consequently policy needs to tighten quickly to catch up. It also reminds us why history has taught us to fear inflation — it’s a wily adversary.
At the same time as the Reserve Bank of Australia is trying to close an unprecedented gap between current policy settings and where they should be, the debate about the operation of monetary policy in Australia will get more form. The Labor Party first argued for a review of the Reserve Bank of Australia, and we expect to see more detail about that over the remainder of 2022.
ANZ’s Chief Economist Richard Yetsenga explains the economic impact of the change of federal government in Australia.
He says unlike votes seen in other countries in the last five years, this isn’t an outcome likely to shock expectations or shock financial markets.
You can read the body copy to find out more.
Of the policy positions discussed during the election, two are of particular interest economically: the labour market and climate.
The Labor government has said they will argue for a higher minimum wage increase than the previous government proposed. Labor also plans increased regulation in several areas – around casual work and wage equity, for example.
On climate, Labor has a larger 2030 carbon reduction target, and is likely to have stronger sectoral policy approaches, such as around the take-up of electric vehicles. The national debate on climate has moved a long way in the last couple of years and more policy detail is likely over the next couple.
Labor has foreshadowed larger budget deficits over the next few years than the previous government, but from a macroeconomic perspective I don’t think the differences are meaningful.
Whichever party won government the deficit was going to stay wide and spending high, with government spending contributing to economic activity at a time the RBA is working intensely to pull it back.
Things have changed
The Australian electorate, like several others worldwide, has become increasingly polarised, more uncertain about major parties, and the nature of stratification within the electorate seems to be changing - all at the same time!
In several other countries, including the United States, United Kingdom and France, the political nexus is shifting from labour versus capital towards something different - more of an urban/higher-educated versus rural/perhaps-less-educated split.
In this election these changes have tended to narrow the stated differences between the parties, rather than widen them, as has sometimes occurred elsewhere.
That was going to leave whichever party was elected at risk of being a bit of a policy piñata. They might be responding to issues as they arise, rather than choosing the issues to prosecute.
There is a slice of good news on reform though. I think some types of reform now have a chance. I am not necessarily optimistic (!), but I am hopeful.
When demand is deficient and deflation the risk, reform is hard to sell because it weakens pricing power in the economy and threatens job security even more. Certainly, that is the case in the short term. But when it’s the supply side of the economy that is the constraint, the reform problem is turned on its head.
For instance, embracing flexible working, improving the national training system, and delivering much higher access to genuinely affordable childcare would seem to be quite easy wins with little apparent adjustment cost, and will pay for themselves in record time.
Judging by the standards of the last 15 years, one thing we can guarantee is the political excitement is unlikely to end with this election result.
Richard Yetsenga is Chief Economist at ANZ
This publication is published by Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited ABN 11 005 357 522 (“ANZBGL”) in Australia. This publication is intended as thought-leadership material. It is not published with the intention of providing any direct or indirect recommendations relating to any financial product, asset class or trading strategy. The information in this publication is not intended to influence any person to make a decision in relation to a financial product or class of financial products. It is general in nature and does not take account of the circumstances of any individual or class of individuals. Nothing in this publication constitutes a recommendation, solicitation or offer by ANZBGL or its branches or subsidiaries (collectively “ANZ”) to you to acquire a product or service, or an offer by ANZ to provide you with other products or services. All information contained in this publication is based on information available at the time of publication. While this publication has been prepared in good faith, no representation, warranty, assurance or undertaking is or will be made, and no responsibility or liability is or will be accepted by ANZ in relation to the accuracy or completeness of this publication or the use of information contained in this publication. ANZ does not provide any financial, investment, legal or taxation advice in connection with this publication.